apk package
chainguard/gitlab-kas-fips-18.6
pkg:apk/chainguard/gitlab-kas-fips-18.6
Vulnerabilities (14)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-32289 | Med | 6.1 | < 18.6.6-r3 | 18.6.6-r3 | Apr 8, 2026 | Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es | |
| CVE-2026-32288 | Med | 5.5 | < 18.6.6-r3 | 18.6.6-r3 | Apr 8, 2026 | tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format. | |
| CVE-2026-32283 | Hig | 7.5 | < 18.6.6-r3 | 18.6.6-r3 | Apr 8, 2026 | If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3. | |
| CVE-2026-32282 | Med | 6.4 | < 18.6.6-r3 | 18.6.6-r3 | Apr 8, 2026 | On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R | |
| CVE-2026-32281 | Hig | 7.5 | < 18.6.6-r3 | 18.6.6-r3 | Apr 8, 2026 | Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C | |
| CVE-2026-32280 | Hig | 7.5 | < 18.6.6-r3 | 18.6.6-r3 | Apr 8, 2026 | During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls | |
| CVE-2026-27144 | Hig | 7.1 | < 18.6.6-r3 | 18.6.6-r3 | Apr 8, 2026 | The compiler is meant to unwrap pointers which are the operands of a memory move; a no-op interface conversion prevented the compiler from making the correct determination about non-overlapping moves, potentially leading to memory corruption at runtime. | |
| CVE-2026-27143 | Cri | 9.8 | < 18.6.6-r3 | 18.6.6-r3 | Apr 8, 2026 | Arithmetic over induction variables in loops were not correctly checked for underflow or overflow. As a result, the compiler would allow for invalid indexing to occur at runtime, potentially leading to memory corruption. | |
| CVE-2026-27140 | Hig | 8.8 | < 18.6.6-r3 | 18.6.6-r3 | Apr 8, 2026 | SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. | |
| CVE-2026-1182 | — | < 18.6.6-r2 | 18.6.6-r2 | Mar 12, 2026 | GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.14 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to gain unauthorized access to confidential issue title created in public projects under certain | ||
| CVE-2025-68121 | Cri | 10.0 | < 18.6.6-r0 | 18.6.6-r0 | Feb 5, 2026 | During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and | |
| CVE-2025-61732 | — | < 18.6.6-r0 | 18.6.6-r0 | Feb 5, 2026 | A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary. | ||
| CVE-2025-61727 | — | < 18.6.1-r1 | 18.6.1-r1 | Dec 3, 2025 | An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com. | ||
| CVE-2025-61729 | — | < 18.6.1-r1 | 18.6.1-r1 | Dec 2, 2025 | Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a |
- affected < 18.6.6-r3fixed 18.6.6-r3
Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es
- affected < 18.6.6-r3fixed 18.6.6-r3
tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format.
- affected < 18.6.6-r3fixed 18.6.6-r3
If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3.
- affected < 18.6.6-r3fixed 18.6.6-r3
On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R
- affected < 18.6.6-r3fixed 18.6.6-r3
Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C
- affected < 18.6.6-r3fixed 18.6.6-r3
During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls
- affected < 18.6.6-r3fixed 18.6.6-r3
The compiler is meant to unwrap pointers which are the operands of a memory move; a no-op interface conversion prevented the compiler from making the correct determination about non-overlapping moves, potentially leading to memory corruption at runtime.
- affected < 18.6.6-r3fixed 18.6.6-r3
Arithmetic over induction variables in loops were not correctly checked for underflow or overflow. As a result, the compiler would allow for invalid indexing to occur at runtime, potentially leading to memory corruption.
- affected < 18.6.6-r3fixed 18.6.6-r3
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
- CVE-2026-1182Mar 12, 2026affected < 18.6.6-r2fixed 18.6.6-r2
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.14 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to gain unauthorized access to confidential issue title created in public projects under certain
- affected < 18.6.6-r0fixed 18.6.6-r0
During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and
- CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026affected < 18.6.6-r0fixed 18.6.6-r0
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.
- CVE-2025-61727Dec 3, 2025affected < 18.6.1-r1fixed 18.6.1-r1
An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com.
- CVE-2025-61729Dec 2, 2025affected < 18.6.1-r1fixed 18.6.1-r1
Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a