CVE-2026-7524
Description
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.1 could allow remote code execution due to improper validation of symbolic links during archive extraction.
AI Insight
LLM-synthesized narrative grounded in this CVE's description and references.
Improper validation of symbolic links in Langflow OSS archive extraction allows RCE via crafted tar files.
Vulnerability
CVE-2026-7524 is a path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) in the _unpack_bundle function of Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.1. The function improperly validates symbolic links during archive extraction, allowing an attacker to craft a malicious tar file containing symlinks pointing to arbitrary files on the system [1].
Exploitation
An attacker can upload a malicious tar file to a Langflow OSS deployment that uses file processing components (e.g., Docling, Read File, Unstructured API) in a RAG chatbot scenario. The tar archive contains symlinks targeting sensitive files such as the JWT secret key. When extracted, the symlinked files are processed and stored in the vector database. The attacker can then query the chatbot to retrieve the contents of those sensitive files [1].
Impact
Successful exploitation allows the attacker to read arbitrary files, including the JWT secret key. With this key, the attacker can forge JWT tokens to bypass authentication and then execute arbitrary code via the Python Interpreter node, achieving remote code execution. The CVSS v3 score is 9.8 (Critical) with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability [1].
Mitigation
As of the publication date, IBM has not released a patch for CVE-2026-7524. The security bulletin notes no workarounds or mitigations are available [1]. Administrators should monitor IBM's support page for updates.
AI Insight generated on May 27, 2026. Synthesized from this CVE's description and the cited reference URLs; citations are validated against the source bundle.
Affected products
2- Range: >=1.0.0 <=1.9.1
Patches
0No patches discovered yet.
Vulnerability mechanics
No source-code context for this CVE — mechanics is only generated when we can read the actual fix diff. Without that, the four sections (root cause, attack vector, affected code, fix) would be speculation rather than analysis.
References
1News mentions
0No linked articles in our index yet.