VYPR
High severity8.8NVD Advisory· Published Jun 19, 2026

CedarJava has type confusion vulnerability

CVE-2026-55772

Description

Summary

CedarJava is an open source Java implementation of the Cedar policy language, used for fine-grained authorization decisions. Under certain circumstances, improper input handling could allow type confusion across the Java-Rust FFI boundary.

Impact

Record-to-Entity type confusion across the Java-Rust FFI boundary

CedarJava sends authorization requests to the Rust cedar-policy evaluator as JSON. The JSON protocol reserves magic single-key object shapes (__entity and __extn) for entity references and extension values. When serializing a CedarMap, there is no validation preventing these reserved keys from being used. If an integrating service builds a CedarMap from caller-supplied key/value data (such as request headers, user-defined metadata, or resource tags), an actor who controls those keys could cause the Rust evaluator to interpret a record as an entity reference.

This issue requires the integrating service to build a CedarMap where the an actor controls the keys, and a policy must reference that value in a when/unless clause.

### Impacted versions: < 4.9

Patches

Addressed in CedarJava version 2.3.6, 3.4.1, and 4.9 and above. We recommend upgrading to the latest version and ensuring any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes.

Workarounds

Enable schema-based request validation to catch type mismatches. Validate that user-controlled data does not contain reserved keys (__entity or __extn) before building CedarMap objects.

References

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, we ask that you contact us directly via email to cedar-policy-security@lists.cncf.io. Please do not create a public GitHub issue.

AI Insight

LLM-synthesized narrative grounded in this CVE's description and references.

Affected products

1

Patches

Vulnerability mechanics

No source-code context for this CVE — mechanics is only generated when we can read the actual fix diff. Without that, the four sections (root cause, attack vector, affected code, fix) would be speculation rather than analysis.

References

2

News mentions

0

No linked articles in our index yet.