VYPR
Medium severity6.8NVD Advisory· Published Jun 19, 2026· Updated Jun 19, 2026

OpenBao: LDAPi ldaputil (wrong escape func)

CVE-2026-55770

Description

1. Description

Component

sdk/helper/ldaputil/client.go — the shared LDAP utility library used by both the LDAP authentication backend and OpenLDAP secrets engine to construct LDAP search filters and bind DNs.

Root

Cause

The LDAP utility contains a function selection error that causes incorrect escaping of user-controlled input in LDAP filter construction. Two lines construct the bindDN using EscapeLDAPValue():

// Line 191 — UPN Domain path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s@%s", EscapeLDAPValue(username), cfg.UPNDomain)

// Line 193 — User DN path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s=%s,%s", cfg.UserAttr, EscapeLDAPValue(username), cfg.UserDN)

The problem: EscapeLDAPValue() implements RFC 4514 escaping, which is designed for Distinguished Name (DN) components. It only escapes characters meaningful in DNs: +, ,, ;, ", \, <, >, and leading/trailing spaces.

LDAP search filters (RFC 4515) have a different set of special characters: *, (, ), \, and NUL (\x00). None of these are escaped by EscapeLDAPValue(). The correct function is ldap.EscapeFilter() from the github.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3 package.

The irony: the same file uses ldap.EscapeFilter() correctly at lines 225-226 in RenderUserSearchFilter() for the UserFilter template path, but the GetUserDN() function at lines 191-193 uses the wrong escape function.

Exploitation

Mechanics

Username: alice)(objectClass=*
↓ EscapeLDAPValue (no-op — no DN special chars)
alice)(objectClass=*
↓ fmt.Sprintf("(&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=%s))", escapedUsername)
(&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(objectClass=*))
                              ^^ injection point

The filter (&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(objectClass=*)) is logically equivalent to: - sAMAccountName=alice AND objectClass=user AND objectClass=*

Since all entries match objectClass=*, the filter matches any user entry where sAMAccountName is alice, effectively ignoring the objectClass=user constraint. By crafting more sophisticated injections (e.g., alice)(|(sAMAccountName=admin), the attacker can match arbitrary different user entries.

Preconditions

  • LDAP authentication backend must be configured
  • Directory must be Active Directory (UPNDomain path) or use UserDN/UserAttr binding
  • Attacker controls the username field at login time

2. Proof of Concept

# Login with LDAP injection payload as username
curl -k -X POST \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "username": "alice)(sAMAccountName=*",
    "password": "anything"
  }' \
  https://localhost:8200/v1/auth/ldap/login/admin

# LDAP filter constructed:
# (&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(sAMAccountName=*))
#                   injection ──────────^
# The filter matches the first user with objectClass=user
# If the LDAP server returns admin's entry first, the token
# is bound to the admin entity, inheriting all admin policies

The LDAP search returns whichever entry the server ranks highest among results. In Active Directory with default sorting, this is often the oldest or alphabetically first user — potentially an administrative account.

3. Impact

| Impact | Detail | |--------|--------| | Confidentiality | Token bound to a different LDAP user (e.g., admin) grants access to all secrets and policies belonging to that entity | | Integrity | Ability to modify secrets, write policies, or configure backends as the impersonated user | | Availability | Low direct impact, but administrative access enables disabling or misconfiguring the entire OpenBao instance |

Likelihood: HIGH — the escape function mismatch is a well-documented antipattern in OWASP LDAP Injection guidance. The attack is trivially exploitable with no special tooling beyond curl.

Why

This Is High Severity

The LDAP auth backend is frequently used as a primary authentication method for enterprise OpenBao deployments. A successful LDAP injection against this backend can bypass the entire authentication chain, granting administrative access to the secrets store without needing to compromise an actual admin account.

4. Remediation

Primary

Fix: Use ldap.EscapeFilter

Replace EscapeLDAPValue with ldap.EscapeFilter in both filter construction paths:

import "github.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3"

// Line 191 — UPN Domain path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s@%s", ldap.EscapeFilter(username), cfg.UPNDomain)

// Line 193 — User DN path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s=%s,%s", cfg.UserAttr, ldap.EscapeFilter(username), cfg.UserDN)

EscapeLDAPValue is still the correct choice for actual DN construction (where values are used as RDN components rather than filter values), but any value interpolated into an LDAP filter string must use ldap.EscapeFilter.

Audit: All Call Sites

Review all usages of EscapeLDAPValue across the codebase to ensure none are used in filter context:

grep -rn "EscapeLDAPValue" /root/cve-audit/openbao/

Defense-in-Depth

  • Apply the principle of least privilege to LDAP service accounts used by OpenBao
  • Use UserFilter with explicit attribute constraints to limit the search scope

AI Insight

LLM-synthesized narrative grounded in this CVE's description and references.

Affected products

1

Patches

Vulnerability mechanics

Root cause

"Function selection error: `EscapeLDAPValue()` (RFC 4514 DN escaping) is used instead of `ldap.EscapeFilter()` (RFC 4515 filter escaping) when constructing LDAP search filters, leaving filter-special characters unescaped."

Attack vector

An attacker who controls the `username` field at login time can inject LDAP filter metacharacters (`*`, `(`, `)`, `\`) because `EscapeLDAPValue()` only escapes DN-special characters and leaves filter-special characters untouched [ref_id=1]. By supplying a payload such as `alice)(sAMAccountName=*`, the resulting filter `(&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(sAMAccountName=*))` matches a different LDAP entry than intended. The LDAP server returns whichever entry ranks highest (often an administrative account), and the resulting Vault token inherits that entry's policies, granting unauthorized access [ref_id=2].

Affected code

The vulnerability resides in `sdk/helper/ldaputil/client.go` in the `GetUserDN()` function, where `EscapeLDAPValue()` (RFC 4514 DN escaping) is used instead of `ldap.EscapeFilter()` (RFC 4515 filter escaping) when constructing LDAP search filters. The same mistake appears in `builtin/logical/openldap/client.go` in the `UpdateDNPassword()` function. Both files are patched in commit `10b7825c714c1ef25b6c3c1c2cd6ecd8747c0659` [patch_id=6640291].

What the fix does

The patch replaces `EscapeLDAPValue()` with `ldap.EscapeFilter()` in two locations: the `GetUserDN()` function in `sdk/helper/ldaputil/client.go` and the `UpdateDNPassword()` function in `builtin/logical/openldap/client.go` [patch_id=6640291]. `ldap.EscapeFilter()` correctly escapes all characters special to LDAP search filters per RFC 4515 (`*`, `(`, `)`, `\`, NUL), preventing injection of filter syntax through the username parameter [ref_id=3]. The same file already used `ldap.EscapeFilter()` correctly in `RenderUserSearchFilter()`, confirming this was a function-selection error rather than a missing capability [ref_id=1].

Preconditions

  • configLDAP authentication backend must be configured
  • configDirectory must be Active Directory (UPNDomain path) or use UserDN/UserAttr binding
  • inputAttacker controls the username field at login time

Generated on Jun 19, 2026. Inputs: CWE entries + fix-commit diffs from this CVE's patches. Citations validated against bundle.

References

5

News mentions

0

No linked articles in our index yet.