CVE-2026-53859
Description
OpenClaw before 2026.5.26 allows SSRF-like bypass of hostname blocklists via trailing-dot notation in model/workspace URLs.
AI Insight
LLM-synthesized narrative grounded in this CVE's description and references.
OpenClaw before 2026.5.26 allows SSRF-like bypass of hostname blocklists via trailing-dot notation in model/workspace URLs.
Vulnerability
OpenClaw versions before 2026.5.26 contain a hostname validation vulnerability [1][2]. The flaw resides in request paths that accept model- or workspace-derived URLs: the same hostname presented with a trailing dot (e.g., example.com.) is not compared consistently against the operator's blocklist, allowing the URL to bypass the intended policy [1].
Exploitation
An attacker must have access to a request path where model- or workspace-derived URLs are processed [1]. No special privileges beyond the ability to craft such a request are required; the attacker simply appends a trailing dot to a blocked hostname [1][2]. The condition is reachable only when the affected feature is enabled [1].
Impact
Successful exploitation allows an attacker to reach a destination that the operator intended to block through their hostname policy [1][2]. The practical impact depends on the operator's configuration—if the bypassed hostname is internal or sensitive, this could lead to information disclosure or server-side request forgery (SSRF) [2]. The overall impact is constrained by OpenClaw's trusted-operator model, but when lower-trust input reaches the affected path, the bypass can be leveraged [1].
Mitigation
The first stable patched version is 2026.5.26 [1][2]. For unpatched instances, operators should keep private-network and metadata destinations blocked at the proxy or network layer, keep channel and tool allowlists narrow, avoid sharing a Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disable the affected feature when it is not needed [1].
AI Insight generated on Jun 16, 2026. Synthesized from this CVE's description and the cited reference URLs; citations are validated against the source bundle.
Affected products
2Patches
0No patches discovered yet.
Vulnerability mechanics
No source-code context for this CVE — mechanics is only generated when we can read the actual fix diff. Without that, the four sections (root cause, attack vector, affected code, fix) would be speculation rather than analysis.
References
2News mentions
0No linked articles in our index yet.