Kirby: Request header injection in `Http\Remote`
Description
TL;DR
This vulnerability affects Kirby sites and plugins that use the Kirby\Http\Remote class (including Remote::request(), Remote::get(), Remote::post(), and similar helpers) to send outgoing HTTP requests and that pass untrusted, user-controlled data into the headers option of such a request.
By including newline characters in the value of the header, it was possible to inject a separate, independent header that was not intended to be set.
A successful attack requires that an application or plugin forwards attacker-influenced input into a request header value. Sites that only send static, developer-defined headers are *not* affected. The attack does not target Panel users or site visitors directly; it targets the remote service that Kirby connects to.
In Kirby's default configuration, the Remote class is not exposed to untrusted input, so a default installation is *not* affected. The vulnerability becomes relevant for custom code, plugins, or integrations that build request headers from user input.
----
Introduction
HTTP header injection (also known as CRLF injection) is a type of vulnerability that allows an attacker to insert additional, attacker-controlled HTTP headers into a request or response. HTTP headers are separated by carriage-return and line-feed characters (\r\n). If untrusted data containing these characters is placed into a header value without sanitization, an attacker can terminate the intended header early and append headers of their own.
For outgoing requests, this means an attacker who controls part of a header value can add or override headers that the application did not intend to send. Depending on the remote service, this can be used to override security-relevant headers (such as Authorization, Host, or Cookie), to smuggle requests, or to poison caches on the upstream system.
Such vulnerabilities are relevant if untrusted input can reach the header values of an outgoing request – for example, a user-configurable API token, a forwarded tracking identifier, or any other value that originates from a request, form field, or content file.
Affected components
The Kirby\Http\Remote class is used throughout Kirby and by plugins to perform outgoing HTTP requests. Its headers option allows callers to define the headers sent with the request.
As the vulnerability is in the way Remote assembles these headers, it affects all code paths that send a Remote request whose header values contain untrusted data. The Kirby core itself has not passed untrusted data in that way, but plugins or custom code might have used the class in such a way.
Impact
In affected releases, header values passed to Remote were handed to the cURL request library without removing newline characters:
The headers option accepted arbitrary strings as header values and forwarded them to the underlying cURL request unchanged. A value containing \r\n was written verbatim to the socket and therefore split into several header lines on the wire.
For example, a single X-Foo header value of "Bar\r\nX-Injected: pwned" produced two separate headers in the outgoing request:
X-Foo: Bar
X-Injected: pwned
The receiving server parsed X-Injected: pwned as its own header. In the same way, an attacker could override a header that the application set earlier in the same request (for example, replacing a legitimate Authorization header).
The vulnerability allows attackers to inject or override HTTP headers in outgoing requests, provided the affected application or plugin includes attacker-controlled data in a header value.
Patches
The problem has been patched in Kirby 4.9.4 and Kirby 5.4.4. Please update to one of these or a later version to fix the vulnerability.
In all of the mentioned releases, we now strip carriage-return and line-feed characters from header values before they are passed to the underlying request, preventing additional headers from being injected.
AI Insight
LLM-synthesized narrative grounded in this CVE's description and references.
Affected products
1Patches
Vulnerability mechanics
No source-code context for this CVE — mechanics is only generated when we can read the actual fix diff. Without that, the four sections (root cause, attack vector, affected code, fix) would be speculation rather than analysis.
References
4News mentions
0No linked articles in our index yet.