VYPR
High severity8.1NVD Advisory· Published Mar 31, 2026· Updated Apr 2, 2026

CVE-2026-34503

CVE-2026-34503

Description

OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 fails to disconnect active WebSocket sessions when devices are removed or tokens are revoked. Attackers with revoked credentials can maintain unauthorized access through existing live sessions until forced reconnection.

Affected packages

Versions sourced from the GitHub Security Advisory.

PackageAffected versionsPatched versions
openclawnpm
< 2026.3.282026.3.28

Affected products

1
  • cpe:2.3:a:openclaw:openclaw:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    Range: <2026.3.28

Patches

1
7a801cc451e9

Gateway: disconnect revoked device sessions (#55952)

https://github.com/openclaw/openclawJacob TomlinsonMar 27, 2026via ghsa
4 files changed · +149 2
  • src/gateway/server.impl.ts+15 0 modified
    @@ -1196,6 +1196,21 @@ export async function startGatewayServer(
             }
             return false;
           },
    +      disconnectClientsForDevice: (deviceId: string, opts?: { role?: string }) => {
    +        for (const gatewayClient of clients) {
    +          if (gatewayClient.connect.device?.id !== deviceId) {
    +            continue;
    +          }
    +          if (opts?.role && gatewayClient.connect.role !== opts.role) {
    +            continue;
    +          }
    +          try {
    +            gatewayClient.socket.close(4001, "device removed");
    +          } catch {
    +            /* ignore */
    +          }
    +        }
    +      },
           nodeRegistry,
           agentRunSeq,
           chatAbortControllers,
    
  • src/gateway/server-methods/devices.test.ts+120 0 added
    @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
    +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
    +import { deviceHandlers } from "./devices.js";
    +import type { GatewayRequestHandlerOptions } from "./types.js";
    +
    +const { removePairedDeviceMock, revokeDeviceTokenMock } = vi.hoisted(() => ({
    +  removePairedDeviceMock: vi.fn(),
    +  revokeDeviceTokenMock: vi.fn(),
    +}));
    +
    +vi.mock("../../infra/device-pairing.js", async () => {
    +  const actual = await vi.importActual<typeof import("../../infra/device-pairing.js")>(
    +    "../../infra/device-pairing.js",
    +  );
    +  return {
    +    ...actual,
    +    removePairedDevice: removePairedDeviceMock,
    +    revokeDeviceToken: revokeDeviceTokenMock,
    +  };
    +});
    +
    +function createOptions(
    +  method: string,
    +  params: Record<string, unknown>,
    +  overrides?: Partial<GatewayRequestHandlerOptions>,
    +): GatewayRequestHandlerOptions {
    +  return {
    +    req: { type: "req", id: "req-1", method, params },
    +    params,
    +    client: null,
    +    isWebchatConnect: () => false,
    +    respond: vi.fn(),
    +    context: {
    +      disconnectClientsForDevice: vi.fn(),
    +      logGateway: {
    +        debug: vi.fn(),
    +        error: vi.fn(),
    +        info: vi.fn(),
    +        warn: vi.fn(),
    +      },
    +    },
    +    ...overrides,
    +  } as unknown as GatewayRequestHandlerOptions;
    +}
    +
    +describe("deviceHandlers", () => {
    +  beforeEach(() => {
    +    vi.clearAllMocks();
    +  });
    +
    +  it("disconnects active clients after removing a paired device", async () => {
    +    removePairedDeviceMock.mockResolvedValue({ deviceId: "device-1", removedAtMs: 123 });
    +    const opts = createOptions("device.pair.remove", { deviceId: " device-1 " });
    +
    +    await deviceHandlers["device.pair.remove"](opts);
    +    await Promise.resolve();
    +
    +    expect(removePairedDeviceMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(" device-1 ");
    +    expect(opts.context.disconnectClientsForDevice).toHaveBeenCalledWith("device-1");
    +    expect(opts.respond).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
    +      true,
    +      { deviceId: "device-1", removedAtMs: 123 },
    +      undefined,
    +    );
    +  });
    +
    +  it("does not disconnect clients when device removal fails", async () => {
    +    removePairedDeviceMock.mockResolvedValue(null);
    +    const opts = createOptions("device.pair.remove", { deviceId: "device-1" });
    +
    +    await deviceHandlers["device.pair.remove"](opts);
    +
    +    expect(opts.context.disconnectClientsForDevice).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
    +    expect(opts.respond).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
    +      false,
    +      undefined,
    +      expect.objectContaining({ message: "unknown deviceId" }),
    +    );
    +  });
    +
    +  it("disconnects active clients after revoking a device token", async () => {
    +    revokeDeviceTokenMock.mockResolvedValue({ role: "operator", revokedAtMs: 456 });
    +    const opts = createOptions("device.token.revoke", {
    +      deviceId: " device-1 ",
    +      role: " operator ",
    +    });
    +
    +    await deviceHandlers["device.token.revoke"](opts);
    +    await Promise.resolve();
    +
    +    expect(revokeDeviceTokenMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
    +      deviceId: " device-1 ",
    +      role: " operator ",
    +    });
    +    expect(opts.context.disconnectClientsForDevice).toHaveBeenCalledWith("device-1", {
    +      role: "operator",
    +    });
    +    expect(opts.respond).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
    +      true,
    +      { deviceId: "device-1", role: "operator", revokedAtMs: 456 },
    +      undefined,
    +    );
    +  });
    +
    +  it("does not disconnect clients when token revocation fails", async () => {
    +    revokeDeviceTokenMock.mockResolvedValue(null);
    +    const opts = createOptions("device.token.revoke", {
    +      deviceId: "device-1",
    +      role: "operator",
    +    });
    +
    +    await deviceHandlers["device.token.revoke"](opts);
    +
    +    expect(opts.context.disconnectClientsForDevice).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
    +    expect(opts.respond).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
    +      false,
    +      undefined,
    +      expect.objectContaining({ message: "unknown deviceId/role" }),
    +    );
    +  });
    +});
    
  • src/gateway/server-methods/devices.ts+13 2 modified
    @@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ export const deviceHandlers: GatewayRequestHandlers = {
         }
         context.logGateway.info(`device pairing removed device=${removed.deviceId}`);
         respond(true, removed, undefined);
    +    queueMicrotask(() => {
    +      context.disconnectClientsForDevice?.(removed.deviceId);
    +    });
       },
       "device.token.rotate": async ({ params, respond, context, client }) => {
         if (!validateDeviceTokenRotateParams(params)) {
    @@ -283,11 +286,19 @@ export const deviceHandlers: GatewayRequestHandlers = {
           respond(false, undefined, errorShape(ErrorCodes.INVALID_REQUEST, "unknown deviceId/role"));
           return;
         }
    -    context.logGateway.info(`device token revoked device=${deviceId} role=${entry.role}`);
    +    const normalizedDeviceId = deviceId.trim();
    +    context.logGateway.info(`device token revoked device=${normalizedDeviceId} role=${entry.role}`);
         respond(
           true,
    -      { deviceId, role: entry.role, revokedAtMs: entry.revokedAtMs ?? Date.now() },
    +      {
    +        deviceId: normalizedDeviceId,
    +        role: entry.role,
    +        revokedAtMs: entry.revokedAtMs ?? Date.now(),
    +      },
           undefined,
         );
    +    queueMicrotask(() => {
    +      context.disconnectClientsForDevice?.(normalizedDeviceId, { role: entry.role });
    +    });
       },
     };
    
  • src/gateway/server-methods/types.ts+1 0 modified
    @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ export type GatewayRequestContext = {
       nodeUnsubscribeAll: (nodeId: string) => void;
       hasConnectedMobileNode: () => boolean;
       hasExecApprovalClients?: (excludeConnId?: string) => boolean;
    +  disconnectClientsForDevice?: (deviceId: string, opts?: { role?: string }) => void;
       nodeRegistry: NodeRegistry;
       agentRunSeq: Map<string, number>;
       chatAbortControllers: Map<string, ChatAbortControllerEntry>;
    

Vulnerability mechanics

Generated by null/stub on May 9, 2026. Inputs: CWE entries + fix-commit diffs from this CVE's patches. Citations validated against bundle.

References

5

News mentions

0

No linked articles in our index yet.