VYPR
Unrated severityNVD Advisory· Published Apr 3, 2026· Updated Apr 18, 2026

CVE-2026-23460

CVE-2026-23460

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect

syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].

ROSE sockets use four sk->sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN, TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING (-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.

When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites rose->neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket is left with rose->state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose->neighbour == NULL. When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -> rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.

Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271 [2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516

AI Insight

LLM-synthesized narrative grounded in this CVE's description and references.

Missing state validation in Linux ROSE socket connect() allows NULL pointer dereference when a second connect is called while the first is still in progress.

Vulnerability

In the Linux kernel's ROSE protocol implementation, the rose_connect() function does not properly validate the socket state when a second connect() call is made while the first connection attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT). Per POSIX, a second connect on a non-established socket should return -EALREADY, but the code instead proceeds to overwrite rose->neighbour via rose_get_neigh(), possibly setting it to NULL.

Exploitation

To trigger the vulnerability, an attacker must first initiate a ROSE connection (causing the socket to enter TCP_SYN_SENT state) and then call rose_connect() again before the handshake completes. If rose_get_neigh() returns NULL at that point, the socket will be left with rose->state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose->neighbour == NULL. When the socket is later closed via rose_release(), the code path rose_write_internal()rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL) dereferences the NULL pointer, causing a kernel crash (NULL pointer dereference).

Impact

An unprivileged local user with access to AF_ROSE sockets can trigger a kernel panic, leading to a denial of service (system crash). No authentication beyond local system access is required, and no special privileges are needed for the second connect call.

Mitigation

The fix adds a check for TCP_SYN_SENT in rose_connect() to return -EALREADY, preventing the race condition and NULL pointer dereference. The patch has been backported to multiple stable kernel trees as of April 2026 [1][2][3][4]. Users should apply the latest kernel updates from their distribution.

AI Insight generated on May 18, 2026. Synthesized from this CVE's description and the cited reference URLs; citations are validated against the source bundle.

Affected products

1

Patches

0

No patches discovered yet.

Vulnerability mechanics

AI mechanics synthesis has not run for this CVE yet.

References

8

News mentions

0

No linked articles in our index yet.