CVE-2023-29162
Description
Improper buffer restrictions the Intel(R) C++ Compiler Classic before version 2021.8 for Intel(R) oneAPI Toolkits before version 2022.3.1 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
AI Insight
LLM-synthesized narrative grounded in this CVE's description and references.
A buffer restriction flaw in Intel C++ Compiler Classic before 2021.8 allows a privileged local user to escalate privileges.
Vulnerability
An improper buffer restrictions vulnerability exists in the Intel(R) C++ Compiler Classic before version 2021.8 for Intel(R) oneAPI Toolkits before version 2022.3.1 [1]. The issue resides in how the compiler handles certain buffer operations, potentially allowing memory corruption under specific conditions that require local access and elevated privileges [1].
Exploitation
An attacker must have local access to the system and already possess sufficient privileges (e.g., a user account with limited administrative rights) to trigger the vulnerable code path [1]. The exploitation sequence involves manipulating inputs to the compiler in a way that bypasses buffer size checks, leading to a memory corruption condition [1].
Impact
Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to escalate their privileges on the affected system [1]. The exact level of compromise depends on the execution context, but the vulnerability is rated as high severity (CVSS 7.8) [1].
Mitigation
Intel has released Intel(R) C++ Compiler Classic version 2021.8 as part of Intel(R) oneAPI Toolkits version 2022.3.1 to address this issue [1]. Users should update to these fixed versions. No workaround is documented in the available reference [1].
AI Insight generated on May 25, 2026. Synthesized from this CVE's description and the cited reference URLs; citations are validated against the source bundle.
Affected products
3- Range: < 2021.8 (for Intel oneAPI Toolkits < 2022.3.1)
- Range: < 2022.3.1
Patches
0No patches discovered yet.
Vulnerability mechanics
AI mechanics synthesis has not run for this CVE yet.
References
1News mentions
0No linked articles in our index yet.